BY VCG ON 8/3/2026#

The statement contains a valuable psychological truth: yesterday’s mistakes do not necessarily determine tomorrow’s choices. Scripture itself speaks of the inward person being “renewed day by day,” of transformation through the renewing of the mind, and of pressing forward rather than remaining imprisoned by the past. Nevertheless, another opportunity is not a metaphysical reset. Past events and their consequences remain, and genuine repentance may require confession, restitution, changed conduct, and endurance rather than merely declaring a new day. The larger cosmology presented in the comment is not biblical teaching but a modern synthesis of simulation imagery, Gnostic escape theology, Jungian language, and private terminology. Ancient Gnostic systems sometimes distinguished a transcendent highest reality from the lesser powers governing the created world, while Abraxas appears in magical and Gnostic material and was later reworked by Jung as a symbol involving the reconciliation of opposites. No established biblical or historical doctrine, however, identifies a “prime middle,” an “Abraxas knot,” or three pillars through which souls escape into a godless light beyond all universes. Scripture instead identifies God as the Creator of heaven and earth, declares that all visible and invisible things were created through Christ, and presents creation not as an evil prison but as something presently groaning for redemption. Its final hope is “the redemption of our body” and “a new heaven and a new earth,” not the abandonment of embodiment. Paul even says that the Christian hope is not to be permanently “unclothed,” and he describes the body as belonging to the Lord and as a temple of the Holy Ghost. The comment’s language may therefore serve as a private metaphor for psychological growth, but it should not be confused with demonstrated cosmology or with the biblical gospel of creation, incarnation, resurrection, and renewal.

Anonymous:

“Every day [is] a new day in the matrix where you get another try… A mistake yesterday can be fixed tomorrow…

There’s no Gods/lords/kings in the light beyond…

You can’t [exit] when you think there is a God… instead of stewards of the matrix including the prime middle…

This is true Eden.

A harmonic soul beyond space/time and this verse…

Your body is not you.

It’s the host of your light…

More recently people are coming to the transcendent light beyond the Abraxas knot.”

Overall verdict#

This is not one clearly defined doctrine.

It combines:

• A useful insight about learning from yesterday.
• Psychological language about integrating one’s “shadow.”
• Matrix-style simulation imagery.
• Gnostic distrust of the created world.
• Jungian or post-Jungian language concerning Abraxas and opposites.
• A disembodied “light-self.”
• Denial of the biblical Creator.
• Undefined concepts such as “prime middle,” “Abraxas knot,” “three pillars,” and “all verses.”

Some of it can function as metaphor for personal growth. But the speaker repeatedly moves from metaphor to confident claims about the actual structure of reality without supplying evidence.

Most importantly, it is not biblical Christianity. The biblical hope is not to discover that God is only a matrix administrator and escape creation into an impersonal light. It is reconciliation with the Creator, resurrection of the body, and renewal of creation.

All biblical quotations below come from the uploaded KJV Pure Cambridge Edition.

1. “Every day is a new day…you get another try”#

Verdict: A valuable moral insight without the matrix theory#

There is truth here.

A person need not treat yesterday’s failure as proof that change is impossible.

Scripture speaks of:

• Repentance.
• Forgiveness.
• Renewal.
• Growth.
• Putting away former conduct.
• Beginning a different course today.

Paul writes:

“Though our outward man perish, yet the inward man is renewed day by day.”

—2 Corinthians 4:16.

He also says:

“Be not conformed to this world:

but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind…”

—Romans 12:2.

And:

“Forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before,

I press toward the mark…”

—Philippians 3:13–14.

So, the healthy core is:

Yesterday’s failure does not have to determine today’s decision.

But none of this requires a secret matrix, a daily cosmic reset, or erased memories.

Another opportunity is not an undo button#

Some mistakes can be corrected:

• A lie can be confessed.
• Stolen property can be returned.
• An apology can be offered.
• A destructive habit can be abandoned.
• Neglected duties can be resumed.

But the past itself is not deleted.

Some consequences remain:

• Lost time.
• Broken trust.
• Physical injury.
• Trauma.
• Death.
• Opportunities that cannot be recreated.

A better statement is:

Yesterday cannot always be undone, but today can contain repentance, restitution, learning, and changed conduct.

That is more honest than promising that every mistake can simply be “fixed tomorrow.”

2. “The secret is kept because you think yesterday got you for good”#

Verdict: The psychological observation is useful; the secrecy claim is unsupported#

People commonly become trapped by thoughts such as:

“I failed before, so I will fail forever.”

“My worst act defines my identity.”

“There is no point trying again.”

“Change is impossible because the past cannot be altered.”

Rejecting that despair can be healthy.

But the speaker adds:

Someone or something deliberately keeps the daily-new-beginning principle secret.

No evidence is given for:

• Who keeps it secret.
• How it is concealed.
• Why ordinary teachings about forgiveness, rehabilitation, habit change, repentance, and personal growth do not count.
• What mechanism imposes the alleged forgetfulness.

The secrecy claim gives a familiar truth a feeling of hidden revelation.

It is not secret that people can learn from previous days. The speculative addition is the proposed matrix system behind it.

3. “The forgetfulness” and “the sleep”#

Verdict: Undefined terms carrying more weight than the argument can support#

These words might mean:

• Ordinary forgetfulness.
• Spiritual ignorance.
• Repression.
• Failure to remember previous lessons.
• Unconscious behaviour.
• A supposed memory wipe between cosmic cycles.
• Death and rebirth.
• Life within an illusion.

The speaker never clearly defines them.

That makes the claim difficult to test. When a term can change meaning whenever challenged, it explains everything and therefore proves very little.

Biblical “forgetting” is usually not a cosmic memory wipe#

Scripture frequently warns people not to forget:

• God.
• His works.
• His covenant.
• His commandments.
• What they previously learned.

Philippians 3 does speak of “forgetting those things which are behind,” but Paul is not describing amnesia. He is refusing to rest upon former status and achievements or to remain immobilized by the past. He continues consciously toward his goal.

Biblical renewal depends upon truth, remembrance, repentance, and transformation—not forgetting that previous days ever happened.

4. “This is spiritual, not externalized”#

Verdict: This qualification helps, but it conflicts with the rest of the passage#

Taken psychologically, “the matrix” might symbolize:

• Habitual thought.
• Social conditioning.
• Fear.
• Compulsion.
• False identity.
• Internalized shame.
• Repeated destructive patterns.

That can be a productive metaphor.

But the speaker then makes objective cosmological claims:

• There are multiple “verses.”
• There is a light beyond this universe.
• There is no God in that light.
• Apparent gods are matrix stewards.
• A “prime middle” administers a crucible.
• Souls can transcend space and time.
• An Abraxas structure blocks escape.

Those are not merely statements about private psychology. They are claims about what reality ultimately is.

The argument shifts between two positions:

“This is only an inward spiritual metaphor.”

and:

“This is the true architecture of the cosmos beyond space and time.”

Those are not the same claim.

5. “Universe…verse” and “all verses”#

Verdict: Wordplay, not evidence for a multilevel cosmology#

Separating universe into “uni-verse” may produce an evocative metaphor:

One verse among many verses.

But wordplay does not demonstrate metaphysics.

A resemblance between words cannot prove:

• Multiple cosmic verses exist.
• Souls travel between them.
• This universe is a prison.
• A light-realm lies beyond every creator.
• Divine beings govern separate verses.

The argument needs evidence beyond the suggestiveness of the English word.

Language can inspire an idea without establishing that the idea is true.

6. “There are no gods, lords, or kings in the light beyond”#

Verdict: An unsupported theological assertion that directly contradicts Scripture#

The speaker does not merely reject one interpretation of God. He proposes that beyond this universe there is an impersonal state where no God exists because no conflict requires mediation.

That assumes:

1. Deity exists only to regulate conflict.
2. Perfect harmony makes God unnecessary.
3. Authority exists only where struggle exists.
4. The ultimate reality must therefore be impersonal light.

None of those premises is demonstrated.

The biblical God is not a conflict manager created by the universe#

Scripture presents God as the Creator from whom existence comes:

“I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside me…”

“I have made the earth, and created man upon it: I, even my hands, have stretched out the heavens…”

—Isaiah 45:5, 12.

Colossians says concerning Christ:

“For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible…”

“All things were created by him, and for him:

And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.”

—Colossians 1:16–17.

Within biblical theology, God is not one steward located inside creation. He is prior to it and distinct from it.

Someone may reject that biblical claim, but they should say openly:

“I am proposing a different cosmology from the Bible.”

They cannot reasonably present the impersonal light theory as the hidden meaning of biblical Christianity.

7. “The gods were stewards of the matrix”#

Verdict: Gnostic-style cosmology rather than biblical teaching#

The idea resembles forms of ancient and modern Gnostic thought:

• The highest reality lies beyond the visible cosmos.
• Lesser rulers or intermediaries administer the world.
• The physical world restricts or traps the inner spiritual self.
• Salvation comes through awakening and escape rather than reconciliation with the Creator.

Historical Gnostic systems varied greatly, but some did distance the highest God from the created world through intermediary powers and portray redemption as liberation from the world those powers governed. (Cambridge Resolve)

The anonymous comment appears to combine that pattern with modern simulation language:

Archons or rulers become “matrix stewards.”

The material cosmos becomes “the verse.”

Salvation becomes transcendence beyond the system.

That is a modern esoteric synthesis, not a straightforward reading of Genesis, the prophets, Jesus, or the apostles.

8. “The prime middle is the crucible”#

Verdict: Too undefined to evaluate#

“Prime middle” is not explained.

It might mean:

• A mediator between light and darkness.
• A neutral cosmic principle.
• A balancing force.
• An administrator.
• Consciousness between opposites.
• Abraxas.
• A personal being.
• An impersonal process.

Likewise, “crucible” could mean:

• Life as a test.
• Suffering as purification.
• The collision of opposites.
• A spiritual initiation.
• Repeated embodiment.

Without definitions, the phrase sounds profound but carries no definite proposition.

A serious spiritual argument should answer:

• What exactly is the prime middle?
• How is its existence known?
• Is it conscious?
• Did it create anything?
• Why should anyone trust it?
• What would count as evidence against it?
• How does it differ from God, conscience, nature, or psychological conflict?

Until those questions are answered, “prime middle” functions more as mystical atmosphere than explanation.

9. “The Abraxas knot” and the three pillars#

Verdict: A mixture of historical terminology and private invention#

Abraxas or Abrasax is an actual term found in ancient magical and Gnostic contexts, including engraved amulets. It became associated with Basilidian and related cosmological ideas, although ancient sources do not present one perfectly uniform doctrine. (Cambridge Resolve)

Carl Jung later used Abraxas in his Seven Sermons to the Dead, where it functions in a symbolic system involving opposites and the relation between God, Devil, life, death, and the unconscious. Scholarship connects that work with the development of Jung’s psychological thought and his concern with reconciling opposites. (PubMed)

However, I found no established ancient or scholarly doctrine specifically called:

“the Abraxas knot.”

Nor does the speaker explain precisely what the alleged knot is.

It may be their own expression for:

• The entanglement of light and darkness.
• Union of opposites.
• The material cosmos.
• The cycle of embodiment.
• Psychological integration.
• A threefold metaphysical structure.

That is allowable as personal symbolism, but it should not be presented as a recognized ancient doctrine without evidence.

Abraxas is not biblical terminology#

The Bible does not teach:

• Abraxas.
• An Abraxas knot.
• A three-pillar system of light, middle, and darkness.
• Salvation by passing beyond Abraxas.
• A creator subordinate to an impersonal light.

This framework comes from outside Scripture and is then being placed over biblical language.

10. “The goal is to exit this”#

Verdict: The opposite of the Bible’s final hope#

The anonymous system treats the cosmos as something from which the true self must escape.

The biblical story treats creation as:

• Made by God.
• Corrupted through sin.
• Subject to death and decay.
• Awaiting redemption.
• Destined for renewal.

Paul says:

“The whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.”

But the expected outcome is not abandonment of creation:

“The creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption…”

And believers await:

“the redemption of our body.”

—Romans 8:21–23.

Revelation concludes:

“And I saw a new heaven and a new earth…”

—Revelation 21:1.

The biblical pattern is:

Creation → corruption → redemption → renewed creation.

The Gnostic-style pattern is:

Spirit trapped in matter → awakening → escape from the cosmos.

Those are fundamentally different stories.

11. “Your body is not you; it is the host of your light”#

Verdict: Contains a limited distinction but becomes anti-bodily#

Scripture distinguishes among body, spirit, soul, heart, and inward person. A person cannot be reduced merely to bodily appearance or appetite.

Paul can speak of:

“the inward man”

being renewed while the outward person decays.

But the Bible does not present the body as an irrelevant container occupied by an alien spark of light.

Paul writes:

“The body is not for fornication, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body.”

He continues:

“Know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you…?”

“Therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s.”

—1 Corinthians 6:13, 19–20.

Notice the balance:

• Body and spirit are distinguishable.
• Both belong to God.
• The body possesses moral significance.
• The body is destined for resurrection.
• Salvation is not the final rejection of embodiment.

Paul explicitly rejects mere disembodiment as the goal#

Discussing resurrection hope, Paul says:

“Not for that we would be unclothed, but clothed upon, that mortality might be swallowed up of life.”

—2 Corinthians 5:4.

“Unclothed” existence is not presented as the ultimate human goal. The hope is transformed life—mortality swallowed up by life.

Therefore, the biblical formulation would be:

You are more than your present physical condition, but your body is genuinely part of your created identity and is included in God’s redemptive purpose.

Not:

The real you is an imprisoned light using a disposable biological host.

12. “This is true Eden”#

Verdict: It reverses the biblical meaning of Eden#

In Genesis, Eden is:

• A created garden.
• Located within the world God made.
• Inhabited bodily by human beings.
• Filled with plants, rivers, animals, work, food, and relationship.
• Declared within a creation that God called good.

Eden is not described as:

• Beyond all space and time.
• Beyond God.
• Beyond creation.
• A disembodied light realm.
• Freedom from individuality.
• Escape from physical existence.

The biblical tragedy is not that humanity became embodied. Adam is embodied before the fall.

The tragedy is that embodied human beings rebelled against God and lost access to the tree of life.

The final biblical hope likewise contains:

• A city.
• Nations.
• A river.
• The tree of life.
• Resurrection.
• God dwelling with humanity.

It resembles restored and transformed creation—not escape into an impersonal void.

13. “Others are not you; the universe is not you”#

Verdict: One of the comment’s healthier boundaries#

This statement rejects solipsism—the idea that only one’s own mind is real or that everything else is merely oneself projected outward.

That distinction is important:

• Other people have genuine existence.
• Their suffering is not merely material for one’s spiritual development.
• They possess wills, experiences, and moral worth.
• The external world is not reducible to personal consciousness.

Biblical thought strongly maintains a Creator–creature distinction and distinctions among persons.

However, the comment then seems to locate everyone’s deepest identity in one impersonal transcendent light.

That raises unanswered questions:

• Are individual persons ultimately real?
• Are they dissolved into the light?
• Does love remain meaningful if personal distinction disappears?
• What makes one soul distinct from another?
• Is “rejoining” annihilation, absorption, communion, or transformation?

The speaker has not clarified this.

14. “Shadow and void work”#

Verdict: Possible psychological value, but not automatically revelation#

“Shadow work” usually refers to examining rejected, feared, shameful, or unconscious aspects of oneself.

At its best, that can involve:

• Honest self-examination.
• Recognizing anger, envy, fear, and pride.
• Accepting responsibility.
• Understanding recurring behaviour.
• Bringing hidden motives into awareness.

Scripture also calls for self-examination and confession.

But there is a major difference between:

Recognizing one’s hidden sins, wounds, and motives

and:

Treating every image arising from the unconscious as a disclosure of cosmic truth.

Inner experiences can reveal something about the experiencer without revealing the architecture of all universes.

A vision of light and darkness may express genuine psychological conflict. It does not thereby prove Abraxas, cosmic stewards, memory resets, or a reality beyond God.

15. “Your inner temple lets you experiment”#

Verdict: Misuses biblical temple language#

The New Testament does use temple language inwardly and communally.

Paul says:

“Ye are the temple of God, and…the Spirit of God dwelleth in you.”

—1 Corinthians 3:16.

But this means believers belong to God and should live in holiness.

It does not mean:

• The imagination is an infallible simulation chamber.
• Every inner vision is safe.
• Spiritual experimentation produces authoritative knowledge.
• Moral and doctrinal boundaries no longer apply.
• One can discover realms beyond God through introspection.

Scripture instead commands testing:

“Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.”

—1 Thessalonians 5:21.

And:

“Believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God…”

—1 John 4:1.

An “inner” experience is not exempt from examination merely because it felt profound.

16. The system’s central epistemological problem#

The speaker makes enormous claims while giving no way to distinguish truth from imagination.

Consider the chain:

1. A person experiences fear, dreams, inner conflict, or psychological breakthrough.
2. Those experiences are described through light, darkness, sleep, and awakening.
3. The metaphors are treated as literal structures of the universe.
4. New terms are introduced—prime middle, Abraxas knot, all verses.
5. The terms are left undefined.
6. Questioning them can be treated as evidence that the questioner remains trapped in the matrix.

That creates a self-protecting system.

A sound method must permit the possibility:

“This experience was meaningful, but my explanation of it may be wrong.”

Without that humility, private symbolism becomes private revelation and private revelation becomes unquestionable cosmology.

What the comment gets right#

Several insights can be preserved without accepting the metaphysical system:

• Yesterday’s failure need not dictate today’s actions.
• People should learn rather than remain trapped in shame.
• Inner conflict can intensify during serious moral change.
• Fear sometimes resists growth.
• Human identity is deeper than appearance, possessions, and social role.
• Other people are real and should not be reduced to projections.
• Honest self-examination is necessary.
• Repeated practice can reshape conduct.

Those are worthwhile.

What does not follow is:

• Reality resets every day.
• Forgetfulness is imposed by a matrix.
• God is only a cosmic steward.
• The true self is an imprisoned light-particle.
• Physical creation is merely a trap.
• Salvation means escaping all embodiment.
• Abraxas governs a three-pillar cosmic knot.
• Inner experimentation reveals what lies beyond God.

Corrected formulation#

Each day provides another opportunity to repent, learn, repair what can be repaired, and choose differently. The past cannot always be undone, but it need not become an excuse for continuing in the same error. Spiritual growth involves honest examination of hidden motives, fears, wounds, and desires; nevertheless, inner experiences must be tested rather than automatically interpreted as revelations about the cosmos. Biblical faith does not portray the world as a matrix administered by lesser gods or the body as a disposable host for an imprisoned light. It presents one Creator, a creation corrupted but awaiting redemption, human beings as embodied souls whose bodies matter to God, and salvation as reconciliation, resurrection, and renewed creation through Christ.

Satan, Symbol & the Self: A Biblical, Historical & Psychological Rebuttal to the Claim That the Devil Does Not Exist – Library of Rickandria

VCG PAPER PROJECTS – Library of Rickandria

Daily Renewal, the “Matrix,” Abraxas, Disembodied Light & Escaping Creation

Daily Renewal, the “Matrix,” Abraxas, Disembodied Light & Escaping Creation – Library of Rickandria